Mr. Dourson notified the White Home late on Wednesday of his choice to withdraw his title, in keeping with a Senate aide, including that Mr. Dourson wouldn’t stay on the company.
The choice was welcomed by environmental and public well being advocates.
“It’s excellent information that Michael Dourson received’t be deciding which chemical substances are and aren’t protected for our children,” stated Richard Denison, lead senior scientist for the Environmental Protection Fund, an advocacy group. “He was a very poisonous alternative for the job, together with his lengthy report of mercenary science. His presence would even have undermined implementation of the historic chemical security reforms handed by Congress final yr.”
Mr. Dourson declined to answer a request for remark despatched to the company’s public affairs workplace.
His withdrawal adopted the discharge of a number of lots of of pages of his correspondence with chemical business officers whereas he was being thought of for the E.P.A. job. The New York Occasions obtained the emails from Greenpeace, which obtained them in response to a Freedom of Data request to the College of Cincinnati. A lawyer for the college confirmed their provenance.
The emails element an unusually shut relationship with the American Chemistry Council and with particular person corporations whose merchandise are scheduled for precedence evaluation by the E.P.A., amongst them trichloroethylene, generally known as TCE, a unstable natural compound broadly utilized in industrial and industrial processes, and flame retardants. The E.P.A., citing the numerous well being hazards of the chemical TCE, which is broadly used as a degreasing agent and a spot cleaner on clothes, had proposing banning it. If he led the division, Mr. Dourson would have needed to finalize that plan, regardless that he had not too long ago dealt with work for the business defending the industrial use of the identical substance.
The paperwork additionally present that Mr. Dourson’s heart on the college, which accepted cash from the commerce group and different corporations for analysis, despatched a draft paper primarily based on that analysis to the business council to edit earlier than submitting it to a journal for publication — thought of by most to be an unacceptable observe in academia.
“There’s a battle of curiosity if business legal professionals are vetting papers,” stated Arthur Caplan, a professor of bioethics at New York College’s Langone Medical Heart. “All in all, an business commerce group position in writing a paper is a mountain of battle of curiosity.”
Mr. Dourson didn’t reply to a request for touch upon the emails.
Proceed studying the primary story